New survey data issued by Mercer shows that 14% of global banking organizations have ‘clawed back' compensation payments made to employees while a further 3% of organisations have reclaimed the payments but have yet to receive the pay back.
New survey data issued by Mercer shows that 14% of global banking organizations have ‘clawed back’ compensation payments made to employees while a further 3% of organisations have reclaimed the payments but have yet to receive the pay back.
The data comes from Mercer’s Financial Services Executive Compensation Snapshot Survey which looks at compensation structures in 63 global financial services companies, including banks and insurance firms.
Clawbacks, where paid-out compensation is reclaimed based on financial restatement, gross negligence or other malfeasance, are a common feature in bank compensation structures today. Their inclusion has been encouraged by regulators in Europe and North America as a means of managing employee risk-taking following the financial crisis of 2008.
“There are a variety of reasons why actual clawbacks of payments already made are limited – often the concept conflicts with local labour laws so actually recouping the funds can be difficult,” said Vicki Elliott, Global Financial Services Human Capital Leader at Mercer.
“Clawbacks are relatively new phenomena in compensation programs so it will take some time for them to bed down. A small number of clawbacks doesn’t signify that the sector is ignoring lessons from the financial crisis, but does raise legitimate questions about whether companies will actually seek pay-back of compensation paid.”
Elliott also pointed to numerous cases where top executives have succumbed to political and public pressure and “volunteered” to forego bonus payments awarded to them by their Boards as a sign of increased responsiveness in the sector.
“It is worth remembering that the majority of banks have also introduced “malus conditions” on deferred compensation,” she added. “This can result in reduced, or no payouts, of deferred monies. It will be interesting to see if, at a time when the news is dominated by major banking missteps and scandals in the US and the UK, levels of clawback and malus increase in 2012.”
“If they do not,” she concluded, “then it would be fair to ask if the regulatory approach of managing risk through this kind of pay feature is working. Focusing on the manner in which banks are managing risk, performance measurement and compliance internally may achieve much more in terms of sound risk management than the regulatory requirements on pay structures have achieved thus far.”
In Mercer’s report, 44% of banks have had clawback provisions in place prior to 2011- they were more common in North America prior to 2011 than in EMEA – and an additional 18% of banks on both sides of the Atlantic have introduced them subsequently.